Employment

Ethical Behaviour Risk Factors Lessons From Emilio Botin Abbey Santander 2009

Posted on by blogger

Some of the factors that increase the risk of unethical behaviour in organisations are illustrated by the high-profile legal case Chagger v Abbey National plc & Hopkins (2006), in which the Employment Tribunal made a finding of unlawful racial discrimination and (further to Emilio Botin Abbey Santander banking group’s refusal to comply with the Tribunal’s order to reinstate Mr Chagger) ordered Abbey Banco Santander share to pay Mr Chagger the record-breaking 2.8 million compensation for his loss. Abbey Santander share price (the UK bank soon to be re-branded as Santander banking group, and part of the global Emilio Botin Banco Santander Central Hispano Group – BSCH) dismissed Mr Chagger from his employment in 2006, giving a fair redundancy as the reason. However, Mr Chagger believed that the actual reason behind the termination of his employment was unfairness and race discrimination. Mr Chagger was of Indian origin. He worked for Emilio Botin Abbey Santander finance as a Trading Risk Controller, earning about 100,000 a year, and reporting into Nigel Hopkins.

Some ethical behaviour risk factors illustrated by Emilio Botin Abbey Santander 2009 clearly relate to the pursuit of personal goals; the Employment Tribunal found that Mr Hopkins personally desired Mr Chagger’s employment with Abbey Santander share price to be terminated, had pre-planned that Mr Chagger would be dismissed, and had used the compulsory redundancy process as a means to dismiss Mr Chagger, in an unfair and discriminatory manner.

One such factor increasing the risk of unethical behaviour is the amount of discretion an organisation allows its officers; the greater the discretion allowed, the greater the opportunity the officer has for acting in his personal interests. The Employment Tribunal found that the redundancy selection criteria Abbey Santander had permitted Mr Hopkins to apply in assessing and judging the two employees up for redundancy were highly subjective and un-measurable; they afforded Mr Hopkins a very wide discretion. The Employment Tribunal criticised Mr Hopkins for the way in which he had applied that discretion (i.e., for his own interests). As an example, Mr Hopkins had criticised and scored Mr Chagger lower for getting on with work and being self-reliant. The Employment Tribunal thought that other reasonable managers would consider such qualities to be valuable assets, considering Mr Chagger’s highly paid and highly responsible job, and praise and score him highly for. As a further example, during the redundancy process, Mr Hopkins had criticised Mr Chagger on numerous points that Mr Chagger had never been criticised for prior to the redundancy exercise. All the criticisms were inconsistent with previous company records of Mr Chagger’s performance. The Employment Tribunal ruled that the criticisms were unfair not legitimate.

Another such factor increasing the risk of unethical behaviour is the level of autonomy of decision-making and action an organisation allows its officers; the greater the level of autonomy, the greater the opportunity the officer has for acting in his personal interests. The Tribunal found that Mr Hopkins was entirely single-handedly able to advise Abbey’s management to dismiss one of the two Trading Risk Controllers that he managed (of which Mr Chagger was one), was entirely single-handedly able to make Mr Chagger an offer of voluntary redundancy (Mr Chagger refused the offer, and never was an equivalent offer ever made to the other Trading Risk Controller), was entirely single-handedly able to judge and score the two employees up for redundancy, and was entirely single-handedly able to lower Mr Chagger’s redundancy scores to guarantee that he would be the one who would be selected for dismissal.

A different type of factor also increasing the risk of unethical behaviour is the organisation’s focus; a focus on results rather than processes can imply that the ends justify the means. The UK statutory Code of Practice on Racial Policy in Employment provides organisations with guidance concerning good practices and processes. The Employment Tribunal found that Abbey Banco Santander had failed to comply with those processes. Abbey Grupo Santander had failed to comply with the statutory guidance regarding Equal Opportunity training. Mr Chagger had tried to resolve the issues of unfairness and race discrimination around his dismissal directly with Abbey Santander and Mr Hopkins, through the company’s grievance procedures. Santander Abbey had not provided any Equal Opportunity training to any of the managers it had assigned to decide on Mr Chagger’s issues. Not even one manager upheld Mr Chagger’s issues; his issues were simply dismissed out of hand. Emilio Botin Abbey Santander banking group had also failed to comply with the statutory guidance concerning monitoring procedures. The Tribunal found a multitude of monitoring failures (far too many to outline here), as well as the failures to give serious consideration to allegations of racial discrimination and to investigate them promptly.

In 2008, Emilio Botin Abbey Santander and Mr Hopkins appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) against the original Employment Tribunal’s ruling of racial discrimination; the EAT upheld the original Tribunal’s ruling that both Emilio Botin Abbey Santander and Mr Hopkins had racially discriminated against Mr Chagger. Emilio Botin Abbey Santander and Mr Hopkins had also appealed against the record-breaking 2.8 million compensation award; the EAT accepted Abbey Santander’s appeal on the compensation award and remitted it to the original Tribunal for reconsideration. In 2009, matters were escalated to the Court of Appeal (the second highest court in the UK). The Court’s List of Hearings showed that the case was heard on 7 and 8 July 2009. The Court’s records of the hearing were not available at the time of writing this article. The 11KBW set of barristers’ chambers, who represented Emilio Botin Abbey Santander and Mr Hopkins, had reported prior to the hearing that the it was to be about quantum only (i.e., compensation) and not about liability (i.e., not about the wrong committed of race discrimination). That would seem to suggest that the wrong of race discrimination committed by Emilio Botin Abbey Santander and Nigel Hopkins was finalised by the EAT when it upheld that Emilio Botin Abbey Santander and Mr Hopkins had racially discriminated against Mr Chagger, and that Mr Chagger had appealed against the EAT’s ruling to send the compensation award back to the Employment Tribunal stage for reconsideration.

Stop Hunting After Royal Caribbean Employment Opportunities! Create Your Own Money Tree Online

Posted on by blogger

Royal Caribbean employment opportunities are qualified from very well employment conditions and prospective placements equal to worldwide staff and crew. Exactly similar to its matches Carnival and Voyager, Royal Caribbean provides you the glorification of working at one of the most impressive cruise ships along with a phenomenal holiday traveling experience.

If you love meeting up and interacting with new people, a Royal Caribbean employment opportunity is tailor made for you. The additional advantage is that it offers you the ability to gain a beautiful non-taxable profit. Because of its large popularity with worldwide holidaymakers, the Royal Caribbean will all of the time be looking for new and energetic personnel to be recruited in a mixture of on-board and land-based tasks.

However, often these tempting career opportunities slip away from your hands if you adopt a wrong approach. If you believe the online placement agencies too much without collecting the right career information you can never get your dream Royal Caribbean employment in spite of investing your hard-earned money.

Still whenever you succeed to make it, you could observe yourself confronted with realistic troubles that you never guessed even existed. You may have to undertake rough sea conditions, maintain a formal dress code all the time and face non-cooperation from staffs and colleagues because of their lack of proper training.

Is there an alternative?

With the scope of online work expanding everyday, you do not have to depend on your luck for finding favorable employment conditions. You too can join a mass of 14,400 Americans who have willingly sidelined lucrative career opportunities for creating a source of residual income. This will not only give you a chance to make easy money, you can also exercise your creative and strategic skills through a home based business opportunity.

Advantages of a work at home business

Without an employer or overseeing boss to bog you down with work, you can fix your own working hours and manage your personal time as per your requirements. You will be able to live without being afraid from looking into economy and job market collapse and nobody could fire you. Online business systems simply require a computer set and an internet connection to start.

You can soon start earning without spending big bucks as office establishment charge, employee taxes and insurance bills. You can enjoy deductions like business use of a home, internet connections, telephone and long distance bills. All these serve to become great tax saving tools. You can work comfortably from your cozy corner without worrying about meeting deadlines.

Which are the best home based businesses for you

Transcription – Whenever you’ve an eye for detail and can bring down notations, written text could make up a beneficial online work alternative for you. You could prepare lists and prescriptions for international physicians and be exposed to a wide range of people globally.

Clerical/secretarial jobs – You can follow the online advertisements for clerical part time jobholders. Irrespective of where you stay, you can do data entry and earn generous income for your efforts.

A merchant affiliate – You can learn the business tools hands-on by assisting an established merchant in his tasks. This will generate you the power to manage several marketing tools, advertising places, education, and hand holding that could bring you the idea of how to conduct hits to your on internet site.

Whenever one of the first thing you associated with a Royal Caribbean engagement was the entertainment factor, you’ll be able to do it through your online business also. Hold exciting online events and encourage traffic to flow into your site.

Construction Employment Job Search – Get the Best

Posted on by blogger

Construction employment job search should be such that it lets you get the job that suits your profile the best and also allows you to grow and learn in your job.

You can also look for construction jobs overseasas it allows you to learn a lot. You get to know about the ways and methods employed in other countries and a lot more. Construction Connection is a company that brings you the right opportunities in the construction industry. www.constructionconnection.com helps you build a strong network all over the industry so that you can find a job that best suits your profile and also lets you grow and learn in your job. “>The construction industry is booming like never before. With the world recovering from the recent recession, building and infrastructure are on the prime agenda of every nation. Every developing and developed nation is looking for opportunities to grow further. One primal step towards development is a good infrastructure. With more and more innovation in construction and design, the construction industry now offers more exciting challenges and opportunities than ever.

But unfortunately the job segment for the construction industry is not all that organized. As there is a great variety of jobs in the construction industry, it is required that a proper approach should be taken to reach out for prospective employees. No doubt that there are a number of construction recruitment agencies but most of them do not work in an organized manner. Construction employment job search should be such that it lets you get the job that suits your profile the best and also allows you to grow and learn in your job.

You can also look for construction jobs overseasas it allows you to learn a lot. You get to know about the ways and methods employed in other countries and a lot more. Construction Connection is a company that brings you the right opportunities in the construction industry. www.constructionconnection.com helps you build a strong network all over the industry so that you can find a job that best suits your profile and also lets you grow and learn in your job.

Employment Law – Excessive Working Hours – Breach Of Duty Of Care

Posted on by blogger

n the case of Mark Hone v Six Continents Retail Limited (2005), a pub landlord having collapsed due to overwork successfully sued his former employers in the County Court for breach of duty of care.

Mr Hone, the claimant, started working for Bass (now Six Continents) as a pub manager in 1995 and in 1998 was awarded “Pub Manager of the Year”. However, in 1999 he started working at The Old Moat House where he found himself working 13 hour days.

He repeatedly complained to his employers that he was overworked but the employers took no action. He had no assistant manager and other staff members, who left, including two chefs and an administrative worker, were never replaced.

Mr Hone, who had refused to sign a clause opting out of EU legislation that limits the number of hours an employee works, began suffering from headaches and insomnia. In May 2000, he collapsed at work suffering from an anxiety disorder. In 2004, Mr Hone sued Bass for breaching the duty of care owed to him as an employee.

The first instance court ( Swansea County Court ) held that:

Bass had not taken reasonable steps to ensure that Mr Hone did not work over 48 hours, which was likely to cause injury to his health, and that resources were available to employ more support staff for him; and
Bass should pay Mr Hone 21,000 in damages.
Six Continents (formerly Bass) appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal who upheld the Swansea County Court’s judgment.

Comment: This case highlights the importance of not imposing excessive working hours on employees and ensuring that employees have sufficient staff support.

If you require further information contact us at

RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.

Michigan Unemployment Benefits Made Easy

Posted on by blogger

Michigan Unemployment Benefits Explained

The State of Michigan is facing tough times. With rising unemployment and the often complex unemployment benefits system, mistakes are being made and workers are wrongfully being denied their unemployment benefit payments. With new developments in unemployment laws and the federal stimulus package, unemployment benefits in Michigan are worth more than ever. For some beneficiaries, benefits can reach 72 weeks and nearly $30,000.

If an initial claim for unemployment benefits is denied, it is important for an unemployed worker to understand why they were denied, and what they can do to request a re-determination or appeal to protect their rights and get a proper and just determination. This article addresses the basic framework and is intended to help the Michigan unemployment applicant understand the process. In difficult situations, experienced legal representation may be essential.

The Unemployment Application Process in Michigan

During their first week of unemployment, unemployed workers are asked to visit the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agencys website at: http://www.michigan.gov/uia, the website is available to file new unemployment claims Monday Saturday from 7am to 7pm. There is also a telephone option: 1-866-500-0017. Unless instructed otherwise by Unemployment Agency staff, applicants must register within two to three business days at their local Michigan Works! Agency to upload a resume to the Michigan Talent Bank.

First time applicants will receive in the mail the following items:

–A determination showing the amount of weekly benefits and the number of weeks they may receive based on the wages earned.
–A booklet with detailed information about their rights and responsibilities for unemployment benefits.
–If there is an eligibility issue with their claim, they will receive a separate notice.

The unemployment claim process starts with an initial determination by the Unemployment Agency as to whether the applicant is eligible. Provided the applicant was fully employed in an eligible job, the agencys determination is based on two questions: whether the separation from employment was voluntary and, if not, whether the employment termination was based on misconduct. The initial determination is a first look and is not often without mistakes.

Unfortunately, mistakes in the initial unemployment determination are common. The most common mistakes involve inappropriate assumptions about a resignation or overreaching claims of misconduct in employer challenges. Often, employers challenge the benefits based on general performance issues or tardiness, issues not considered to be misconduct under the unemployment law. Misconduct under the employment laws is meant to be a limited category related to outright theft, misrepresentation or workplace drunkenness, not generalized performance issues.

When it comes to voluntary termination of employment, mistakes are often based on assumptions when employees resign just to protect their record, when in fact, many employees resign only involuntarily and only because they have been told their job is ending. Such resignations are not voluntary under the Michigan unemployment laws and should not be used to deny benefits.

Basic Requirements for Michigan Unemployment Benefits

The Michigan unemployment agency looks at the unemployed workers earnings in the first four out of the past five completed calendar quarters to determine if they are eligible for benefit payments. If they do not qualify under the standard base period they will then be reexamined using the four most recent quarters called the alternate base period. There is one last section to determine qualifications that the unemployed worker will have to certify with the State of Michigan. According to the UIA website, To be eligible for unemployment benefits, you must be unemployed and able to, available for, and actively seeking suitable full-time work. Some may worry that if they left their previous employer by turning in a resignation that they would be exempt from unemployment benefits. Although initial unemployment determinations may result in a denial of benefits, the fact of a resignation should not result in a denial, if it is involuntary.

The Process for Unemployment Beneficiaries Explained

Once qualified with an approved claim, the unemployed worker must continually certify their unemployed status with the State of Michigan every other week. The unemployed worker is expected to report to the UIA through the use of the Internet or telephone using Michigans Automated Response Voice Interactive Network, (MARVIN). A scheduled MARVIN appointment is based on the last two digits of their Social Security number. To access MARVIN via the Internet, unemployment beneficiaries can visit http://www.michigan.gov/uia and select the UIA Online Services for Unemployed Workers link. A free UIA online account can be created. MARVIN can also be reached at 1-866-638-3993, to find out scheduled times, beneficiaries can visit http://www.michigan.gov/uia.

How Much Will Michigan Unemployment Beneficiaries Receive and How?

Once approved and certified, it is important to know how the UIA determines the amount of unemployment benefit payment and how to receive it. During the unemployment application process, the UIA will ask the unemployed workers to select a choice of payment through either a state issued debit card or direct deposit into their personal bank account. To determine the specific amount of benefit payments, the UIA staff multiplies the highest amount of wages paid in any base period quarter by 4.1%. For each dependant claimed, the UIA adds $6 per dependant up to five. Currently, the weekly benefit amount is capped at a maximum of $362.

To determine how many weeks of benefits are available to an unemployed worker, the UIA multiplies total base period wages by 43% and then divides that answer by a weekly benefit amount. The initial benefit cannot be less than 14 weeks or more than 26 weeks. However, many emergency changes to the process have resulted in a series of extensions for unemployment beneficiaries. For some, benefits may extend up to 72 weeks. The new federal stimulus package may also include subsidy for extended COBRA benefits for some beneficiaries.

Special Emergency Extensions Available to Michigans Unemployed Workers

In recent developments, the Federal Government has provided an extension of benefits under the Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC), which includes a 20 week extension upon the initial state benefit period. The second part of the EUC is an additional 13 week extension upon that. In addition, Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm signed an extension benefit for an additional 13 weeks as of February 13th, 2009. Therefore, the total of available weeks of unemployment benefits that unemployed workers may receive would equal 72 weeks. The unemployment agency is responsible for notifying those eligible for the extensions when they are approaching the end of their initial claim.

What to Do If Michigan Unemployment Benefits are Denied or Challenged

The Michigan unemployment process is complex and has many layers. The agencys first decision is called a determination. After that the employer or the employee has 30 days to challenge the determination and request a redetermination. If either side is not satisfied, they are given an additional amount of time to request an appeal, to be heard by an administrative law judge at the unemployment agency.

For both sides, the appeal will be the first chance to present evidence and take testimony. After the appeal, challenges may go on to a board of review and then to Michigans court system. The biggest mistake people make is to give up on the process too early or to allow deadlines to pass. Employees often lose their rights sometimes worth over $20,000 simply by missing the deadlines. Sometimes, employers succeed by making continuous challenges and waiting for the employee to give up.

Other times employees may lose because they did not prepare for the appeal, or they are not adequately represented when they get there. When it comes to an appeal, many employees lose because they are not prepared to give testimony at the hearing or they are not represented. Simple steps can be taken to protect unemployment appeal rights. Unemployment advocates are available free of charge through the agency and some private employment attorneys are willing represent individuals in the unemployment process for a flat fee. Whatever they do, beneficiaries should never let their unemployment agency deadlines lapse with out seeking qualified legal advice.